Core 2's

Rusteh · 08-09-2006, 06:03 PM

So the core 2's have been released but I haven't heard nor read much of anything about them yet...any word on performance or the such?

Hurt911gen · 08-09-2006, 07:59 PM

ummm I know OCing them is very easy. I read that 2.9 cores OC to 3.45 with no problems thanks to the lock-free feature...

i'm not swithing my 660 for a while though :tard

Mrs Behavin · 08-09-2006, 09:51 PM

I dont know what that is. Can you tell me please?

Rusteh · 08-10-2006, 02:07 AM

the new pentium chip

actually their easier to overclock because of that and the bigger l2 caches.

Mrs Behavin · 08-10-2006, 04:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rusteh

the new pentium chip

actually their easier to overclock because of that and the bigger l2 caches.

oh gotcha!

thank ya my dahling

lemon · 08-10-2006, 09:48 AM

its a pentium? i thought it was the core duo? nope, im thinking of conroe

and yanah or something like that :banana

Rusteh · 08-10-2006, 03:02 PM

conroe is the core technology in the pentium chip but their retail name are the core 2's or core 2 duo's.

lemon · 08-10-2006, 06:58 PM

why do you think i like the following naming schema:

478 pentium 4 3.0e ghz

socket, processor, speed

real easy to understand. unlike:

775 pentium 4 560j.

that doesnt tell me much past the socket and processor. 560j = nothing to me... except thats the new schema intel uses. unfortunately, i fucking hate it.

and i hear amd is good for gaming

Rusteh · 08-11-2006, 01:55 AM

the new core 2's are supposed to be better then amd's but that's kind of the reason i want to get some input on them...are their worth the hype or is the bark worse then it's bite?

lemon · 08-11-2006, 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rusteh

the new core 2's are supposed to be better then amd's but that's kind of the reason i want to get some input on them...are their worth the hype or is the bark worse then it's bite?

well, as we all know, last gen pentiums always generated more heat then the comparable amd offering.

and now there is two individual cores... :tard

imagine the water cooling & overclocking...

water-fried system

wned

Tattva · 08-15-2006, 03:31 PM

the Core 2s utterly distroy anything AMD currently have to offer. The Intel Duel Core Xeons re toatal monsters

Rusteh · 08-15-2006, 06:14 PM

the xeon's are for servers however...not much for 3d processing...but the conroe's from what I hear are just going to blow the AMD's away until the new AMD's are released

lemon · 08-15-2006, 06:17 PM

*wonders what 10 years will do for the computing industry*

:rock

08-09-2006, 06:03 PM	#1
Rusteh V.I.P User Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 2,846 Tokenz: 1,155	Core 2's So the core 2's have been released but I haven't heard nor read much of anything about them yet...any word on performance or the such?

08-09-2006, 09:51 PM	#3
Mrs Behavin Moderator Staff Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Hot Springs Arkansas Posts: 20,802 Tokenz: 12,139	RE: Core 2's I dont know what that is. Can you tell me please? __________________ http://amyssweettoothrecipes.blogspot.com/ http://dumasgang.blogspot.com/

08-10-2006, 02:07 AM	#4
Rusteh V.I.P User Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 2,846 Tokenz: 1,155	RE: Core 2's the new pentium chip actually their easier to overclock because of that and the bigger l2 caches.

08-10-2006, 09:48 AM	#6
lemon Banned Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 8,514	RE: Core 2's its a pentium? i thought it was the core duo? nope, im thinking of conroe and yanah or something like that :banana

08-10-2006, 03:02 PM	#7
Rusteh V.I.P User Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 2,846 Tokenz: 1,155	RE: Core 2's conroe is the core technology in the pentium chip but their retail name are the core 2's or core 2 duo's.

08-10-2006, 06:58 PM	#8
lemon Banned Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 8,514	RE: Core 2's why do you think i like the following naming schema: 478 pentium 4 3.0e ghz socket, processor, speed real easy to understand. unlike: 775 pentium 4 560j. that doesnt tell me much past the socket and processor. 560j = nothing to me... except thats the new schema intel uses. unfortunately, i fucking hate it. and i hear amd is good for gaming

08-11-2006, 01:55 AM	#9
Rusteh V.I.P User Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 2,846 Tokenz: 1,155	RE: Core 2's the new core 2's are supposed to be better then amd's but that's kind of the reason i want to get some input on them...are their worth the hype or is the bark worse then it's bite?

08-15-2006, 03:31 PM	#11
Tattva Member Join Date: May 2006 Location: England, Yorkshire! Posts: 349 Tokenz: 901	the Core 2s utterly distroy anything AMD currently have to offer. The Intel Duel Core Xeons re toatal monsters __________________ I, Was Told By A Knight Of The Sun That Wisdom Could Set People Free • Be Content In Your Questions But May I Just Mention, Jour Only A Drop In The Sea

08-15-2006, 06:14 PM	#12
Rusteh V.I.P User Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 2,846 Tokenz: 1,155	RE: Core 2's the xeon's are for servers however...not much for 3d processing...but the conroe's from what I hear are just going to blow the AMD's away until the new AMD's are released

08-15-2006, 06:17 PM	#13
lemon Banned Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 8,514	RE: Core 2's wonders what 10 years will do for the computing industry :rock

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Intel Releases Core 2 Extreme Quad Processors	mdvaldosta	Computers	1	11-12-2007 10:08 PM
Trends in Political Values and Core Attitudes: 1987-2007	GraceAbounds	Politics	2	11-01-2007 03:09 PM
Help me build a stable machine:	IntruderLS1	Computers	16	05-21-2007 03:18 PM
what are two processors	Haus	Computers	5	04-13-2007 03:33 PM
Intel Soon To Be Previewing Quad Core Xeon MP	mdvaldosta	Computers	4	10-23-2006 04:13 PM