Did man land on the moon? - Page 2

AbriannaPeto · 04-30-2008, 08:50 PM

Your arguments on whether or not it occured no longer matter, for I went to the moon. The end.

COOL_BREEZE2 · 04-30-2008, 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hexidecimal

Ill see how people answer first before I post my argument...

I say they didnt by the way....

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheOriginalJames

How about Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong? Do you call these living legends liars to their face when they tell you they walked on the moon?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hexidecimal

errrr yes... have you met them?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hexidecimal

........and to lay it out in one go would kill this thread dont you think?

It was all faked and filmed in a studio (as far as im concerned) too argue each point would take us a long time, so Ill start with the simple most obvious and talked about ones.

Why was the American flag flying on the moon? (Im not going to do a "no atmosphere, for any wind statement" ).
was it made of wire? was there a magic gust of wind on the moon in 1969?

COOL_BREEZE2 · 04-30-2008, 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by groundpounder

photos, video feeds, eyewitness testimony (astronauts), thousands upon thousands of different individuals involved in every aspect of the program and TV coverage are all examples of the proof that needs to be refuted by those who think it's all a big conspiracy, not the other way around.

So if you have evidence that we didn't, lay it out and quit playing mindfuckery games, like saying the people that agree with you are the "free-minded ones." Am I to gather from that if one thinks we did land on the moon, that one is some how "close-minded?"

If you're "happy to argue the case," and the case is whether or not we landed on the moon and not who needs to prove what, then quit cuttin bait and start fishin.

As usual, I'm all ears....

Oh, BTW merciless Pounder. Good answer.

On a side note.
Do you think we have a young AEF on our hands?

TheOriginalJames · 04-30-2008, 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hexidecimal

errrr yes... have you met them?

I don't live where they do, Have you met them and asked them questions?

Maulds · 04-30-2008, 11:07 PM

Holy shit Tranquility.......holy mother of fuck...the fucking moon

Hexidecimal · 05-01-2008, 06:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Breath

Google it...

Yeah that was made up after....

Hexidecimal · 05-01-2008, 06:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheOriginalJames

I don't live where they do, Have you met them and asked them questions?

Yeah, he wasnt available for comment....

Hexidecimal · 05-01-2008, 06:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by groundpounder

if you're going to pull this card, little one, you better pull it correctly.

grammar, not grammer.

Best way to win an argument. One shot, one kill.

This is a POWERFUL way to state your position. I can feel myself bending to your will already....

it's "to argue," not "too argue."

Thanks, Breath.

Hook line and sinker

Hexidecimal · 05-01-2008, 06:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by COOL_BREEZE2

Oh, BTW merciless Pounder. Good answer.

On a side note.
Do you think we have a young AEF on our hands?

what an AEF? and young?

Hexidecimal · 05-01-2008, 06:11 AM

oh and here is conclusive proof

Fake Moon Landings The moon landings are fake!

Sneakiecat · 05-01-2008, 08:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hexidecimal

Fake Moon Landings The moon landings are fake!

Phil Plait's Bad Astronomy: Bad TV

BadBoy@TheWheel · 05-01-2008, 09:21 AM

I am moving this to debate

Pudding Time · 05-01-2008, 09:52 AM

None of us here have proof this happened, or did not happen. And we probably never will have proof either way.

RecklessTim · 05-01-2008, 10:34 AM

We know for a fact that the Saturn rockets left earth orbit. That in itself was the hardest part of the trip. So what makes you think that landing on the moon was that big of a step from that point? Are you saying that we invested all that time and effort just to get a rocket to cruise around space for a while and not go to the moon? And to top that off with the photo's and video taken from lunar orbit and on the planet itself (thousands of high res pictures) I find it very improbable that it was faked.

Could those photo's have been faked? sure, anything is possible. But taking into account the absolute perfect attention to detail in accuracy, I do not think it was faked.

Take this into consideration... At the time we visited the moon, the most powerful telescope we had could not take close up pictures of the landing site. We would have to guess at the terrain to recreate it here on earth to properly fake it. Fast forward to today with the Hubble telescope that can see at a resolution of .03 arc seconds. That shows enough detail of the landing site to show that it matches the photo's perfectly... something that could not have been done by guessing 40 years ago.
Now if you are asking why we can't see the Rover or other objects left on the surface of the moon with the Hubble... that's because it would need a resolution of .002 arc seconds to see a 4 meter object at the current distance.

So I will believe until there is proof otherwise, not speculation, but proof.

DaveM · 05-01-2008, 10:44 AM

I beleive there did, tere is more than enough conclusive evidence to prove that they did, than didn't, and before you mention any of the caveats, such as no stars, go out into a very brightly lit town, it become nigh on impossible to see stars, does that mean that humans living on earth is all one big conspiracy and faked for public morale?

04-30-2008, 08:50 PM	#16
AbriannaPeto Auntie Bri Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Sl,ut Posts: 4,393 Tokenz: 60,893	Re: Did man land on the moon? Your arguments on whether or not it occured no longer matter, for I went to the moon. The end. __________________ Not all 'young people' listen to the media.

04-30-2008, 11:07 PM	#20
Maulds Moderator Staff Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: TN Posts: 4,832 Tokenz: 8,580	Re: Did man land on the moon? Holy shit Tranquility.......holy mother of fuck...the fucking moon __________________ Member Of The Conservatives In Exile Est.11/5/2008 anticipated date of death 11/6/2012

05-01-2008, 06:11 AM	#25
Hexidecimal Banned Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 84	Re: Did man land on the moon? oh and here is conclusive proof Fake Moon Landings The moon landings are fake!

05-01-2008, 09:21 AM	#27
BadBoy@TheWheel Hilbilly Deluxe Senior Staff Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: On A Milk Carton Posts: 15,237 Tokenz: 29,949	Re: Did man land on the moon? I am moving this to debate __________________ Charter Member of The Conservatives In Exile 11/5/2008

05-01-2008, 09:52 AM	#28
Pudding Time Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 3,203	Re: Did man land on the moon? None of us here have proof this happened, or did not happen. And we probably never will have proof either way.

05-01-2008, 10:34 AM	#29
RecklessTim Proud Father & Administrator Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Allentown, PA Posts: 7,823 Tokenz: 131,808	Re: Did man land on the moon? We know for a fact that the Saturn rockets left earth orbit. That in itself was the hardest part of the trip. So what makes you think that landing on the moon was that big of a step from that point? Are you saying that we invested all that time and effort just to get a rocket to cruise around space for a while and not go to the moon? And to top that off with the photo's and video taken from lunar orbit and on the planet itself (thousands of high res pictures) I find it very improbable that it was faked. Could those photo's have been faked? sure, anything is possible. But taking into account the absolute perfect attention to detail in accuracy, I do not think it was faked. Take this into consideration... At the time we visited the moon, the most powerful telescope we had could not take close up pictures of the landing site. We would have to guess at the terrain to recreate it here on earth to properly fake it. Fast forward to today with the Hubble telescope that can see at a resolution of .03 arc seconds. That shows enough detail of the landing site to show that it matches the photo's perfectly... something that could not have been done by guessing 40 years ago. Now if you are asking why we can't see the Rover or other objects left on the surface of the moon with the Hubble... that's because it would need a resolution of .002 arc seconds to see a 4 meter object at the current distance. So I will believe until there is proof otherwise, not speculation, but proof. __________________ Mr President; It has been reported that you are here to "lecture" us on democracy and human rights. But with a record like yours, you will not be very convincing.

05-01-2008, 10:44 AM	#30
DaveM I R DA MANGO PIRATE! YARR Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: in my basement, making a suit of skin Posts: 1,812 Tokenz: 8,649	Re: Did man land on the moon? I beleive there did, tere is more than enough conclusive evidence to prove that they did, than didn't, and before you mention any of the caveats, such as no stars, go out into a very brightly lit town, it become nigh on impossible to see stars, does that mean that humans living on earth is all one big conspiracy and faked for public morale? __________________

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Hunterdon County man must pay support for child not his	GraceAbounds	Relationships & Family	24	02-09-2008 03:26 PM
This is beautiful.. but long MERRY CHRISTMAS!	SouthOfHeaven	General Discussion	6	12-24-2007 03:42 PM
NASA To Support UK Moon Mission	Peter Parka	Space	1	12-15-2007 01:43 AM
Shine of the moon	Sam	Poetry	3	12-22-2006 07:32 AM